Failing to Score a Bottom
I was East, dealer, vulnerable against not, for the last board on Thursday, 29 August 1991 at the Sheffield Bridge Club strongest-field-of-the-week evening duplicate.
E/W Vuln
Dealer E
| | A 10 9 8 2 |
---|
| A J 9 8 7 |
---|
| 10 5 4 |
---|
| — |
---|
|
| — |
---|
| K Q 10 6 4 |
---|
| K |
---|
| A K Q J 7 4 2 |
---|
| | |
| |
At some tables, East opened 3
. West was then generally left in peace to drift quietly two off in 5
for a good score. But if East failed to open, the board became a minefield, for South would open 3
and North, with his long majors, would double anything that West bid. Disaster was exacerbated if West made a take-out bid of South's 3
. Such calamity befell me!
West | North | East | South |
---|
| | Pass | 3 |
31 | X | 4 | Pass |
5 | X | 5 | Pass |
6 | X | 6 | Pass |
Pass2 | X | XX3 |
Pass
|
Pass4 | Pass | | |
Notes |
---|
(1) | Artificial take-out. (Double would have been for penalties) |
---|
(2) | In despair! |
---|
(3) | A pathetic attempt to intimidate the opposition when a bottom appeared almost inevitable. |
---|
(4) | This is the last time I partner Barrie! |
---|
6
XX went five off for minus 2800. However, -1400 would have saved some Match Points. One pair reached the ceiling in 7NT doubled going nine off for -2600! But -2600 was still worth 4 Match Points! The Poor-Bridge-of-the-evening prize went to the pair that ended up in 7
X minus ten for -2900!
The 21 Point Slam Missing Three Aces
N/S Vuln
Dealer W
| | J 10 8 6 2 |
---|
| A Q 8 3 |
---|
| K J 7 5 |
---|
| — |
---|
|
| | |
| |
It was the BBL Summer Congress at Buxton in 1993. I was playing with Dave Robinson, whom I consider to be probably the top player in Yorkshire, in the Swiss Teams, when the above deal turned up. North-South were vulnerable and West, as dealer, passed. Dave opened 1
and I responded 2
. Spurred on by his void in clubs, Dave jumped to 4
. I considered that I had some shape and that my values seemed to be in the right places, so I bid 4NT, ordinary Blackwood, which does not appear to be the best thing to do on this hand! Dave responded 5
, which is just what I didn't want to hear! I retreated to 5
, but was raised to 6
by Dave, who judged that my presumed one missing ace was not
A!
6
appears to be a hopeless contract requiring extremely poor defence. But this web site is all about poor defence (and bidding and play)!
A was led and I surveyed the scene. Slam with only 21 points and missing three aces! But West then made the mistake of continuing with a small diamond, presumably attempting to force me into some premature decision about that suit. I seized my only opportunity and played
J, which held, and I discarded
Q. I cashed
K and discarded
K and it was all over. The rest was now easy, even for me! The 11 IMPs gained swung the match in our favour!